ClickCease
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • Copywriting and Content
Menu

I Sell Words - Melbourne Copywriting, Marketing, Blogs and SEO Content

tom@isellwords.com.au
Melbourne
+61 417120749
I sell words because my words sell. - Melbourne Copywriter Tom Valcanis

Your Custom Text Here

I Sell Words - Melbourne Copywriting, Marketing, Blogs and SEO Content

  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • Copywriting and Content

Fake News: why don't we call it a spade?

July 6, 2021 Tom Valcanis
truth copywriting melbourne
Image by PDPics from Pixabay

Do you ever find yourself agreeing or respecting a talking head that talks in "Plain English," uses "common sense" and "calls a spade a spade?"

I sure do - then my internal BS detector goes off and I realise they're politicians and they speak exclusively in spin and doublespeak. But I digress.

A lot of us are familiar with the term "fake news." It's a highly abstract term for news reporting, which is meant to be objective, instead is misrepresented by being opinion or outright falsehood.

"Fake news" isn't new. Because lying through one's teeth isn't new.

Fake news, like the words bathroom, PTSD, and sanitation engineer all hopped on a phenomenon called the euphemism treadmill.

This process, as described by scholar and linguist Steven Pinker, is a societal shift from the use of certain words towards more palatable alternatives.

Think of the word "toilet." In most situations toilets - and the actions performed there - is something that high society would rather not mention in good company. So we adapted the word bathroom. This still contained some vestige of bodily contact with porcelain (bath) and we ran the treadmill again and landed upon restroom. A few more miles on the rubber excised the room entirely: lavatory. An ancient case of "if you know, if you know."

The same happened to soldiers in World War I that suffered from "shell shock", which then became "battle fatigue" by World War II, and the present day "combat-induced Post Traumatic Stress Response."

Printing lies was once called yellow journalism, which is now called fake news. It connotes an air of lost respectability; that organisation still peddles news but it's either distorted, slanted, or outright made-up. The generation of today trying to make its mark on what came before. It's novel to us, but not to history.

Why do we do it? It's hard to tell. We as humans seem to want to forget about the unpleasant facts of life sometimes - why do we use the euphemism "passed on" instead of "died?" - and our cognitive shields go up as a result.

As much as we want to call fake news spades and spades toilets; we need to be reminded of the context in which we utter the word and those who will hear it.

As much as you'd like to tell grandma you need to "drop a deuce in the shitter" I think we'd all be better off if you excused yourself to "use the lavatory" instead.


Sign up here for the Word on Words for all the latest blogs, tips, and special offers.

In Copywriting, Word Tags words, euphemisms, fake news, facts, copywriting

The Word on Words: Once read, twice remembered, thrice quoted

May 9, 2014 Tom Valcanis
Sir Winston Churchill using the appropriate "V for victory" sign. Being a man of the upper classes, he was unaware of the vulgar connotations when making the "V" palm inward.

Sir Winston Churchill using the appropriate "V for victory" sign. Being a man of the upper classes, he was unaware of the vulgar connotations when making the "V" palm inward.

Winston Churchill, John F. Kennedy remarked, "Mobilised the English language into battle." But how did he achieve such a feat? One of the many rhetorical devices Churchill effectively employed, and often, was the Tricolon. The tricolon, derived from Isocolon, is a figure of speech using three parts, or cola, balanced in structure, weight and rhythm.

It's more simply known as the "list of three." Referring to an impassioned defence of his homeland during the Battle of Britain in August, 1940, he said ""Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few." The last part is a perfect tricolon.

So powerful is this rule, history incorrectly remembers Churchill talking of "blood, sweat and tears" after his appointment to the prime ministership. In actuality, he said "blood, toil, tears and sweat." Which is an example of a less memorable tetracolon.

Sources: Historywow.com and The Elements of Eloquence, by Mark Forsyth

In Word Tags words, rhetoric, facts, history

Powered by Squarespace